[E-rundbrief] Info 904 - Vanunu Verzicht auf Friedensnobelpreis

[Matthias Reichl]

E-Rundbrief - Info 904 - Rannie Amiri (counterpuch): Rise Above the 
Prize - Mordechai Vanunu's Nobel Stand. (Mordechai Vanunu's Verzicht auf 
die Nominierung für den Friedensnobelpreis.)

Bad Ischl, 21.3.2010

Begegnungszentrum für aktive Gewaltlosigkeit

www.begegnungszentrum.at

================================================

Rise Above the Prize

Mordechai Vanunu's Nobel Stand

By RANNIE AMIRI

Counterpunch, 5.3.2010

     “He [Vanunu] has written letters to us this year and last year 
also, where he stated explicitly that he did not want to be a candidate 
for the Nobel Peace Prize. The reason he gave was that Simon Peres had 
received the Nobel Peace Prize, and Peres he alleged was the father of 
the Israeli atomic bomb and he did not want to be associated with Peres 
in any way.”

     – Geir Lundestad, Director of the Norwegian Nobel Institute and 
Secretary of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, 24 February 2010.

For the first time in the history of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, a 
preemptive request to withdraw a nomination—by the nominee—was made.

It was revealed last week that in a letter to the Committee, Mordechai 
Vanunu had asked for his candidacy to be rescinded. It was unusual 
enough for Geir Lundestad to acknowledge that a nomination had even been 
received, let alone publicly disclose Vanunu’s request. But for Vanunu—a 
man who should have been awarded the Peace Prize long ago—it was in full 
keeping with the dignity, integrity and uncompromising nature of one to 
whom the world owes a great debt.

Mordechai Vanunu – more than just a whistleblower

Vanunu worked as a technician at Israel’s Dimona nuclear plant in the 
Negev Desert from 1976-1985. In a 1986 interview with The Sunday Times, 
he courageously exposed, for the first time, his country’s clandestine 
nuclear activity. A week prior to the interview’s publication, he was 
lured by a Mossad agent from London to Rome, where he was apprehended 
and whisked off to Israel. In secret proceedings, Vanunu stood trial for 
treason, was swiftly convicted, and sentenced to 18 years behind bars. 
He spent more than 11 of them in solitary confinement.

Vanunu was released from Ashkelon’s Shikma prison in April 2004, 
unapologetic and unrepentant. “I am proud and happy to do what I did,” 
he said.

As for enduring nearly two decades of incarceration?

“I said to the Shabak [Shin Bet], the Mossad, ‘you didn't succeed to 
break me, you didn't succeed to make me crazy.’”

Conditions of his parole prohibited him from speaking with journalists, 
supporters, or non-Israelis of any kind. He was restricted from 
travelling within the country and barred altogether from leaving it.

In 2007, Vanunu was found to be in violation of his parole, in part for 
attempting to travel from Jerusalem to Bethlehem, and it landed him in 
jail for another three months. Being a convert to Christianity and an 
advocate for Palestinian rights did not help his case, but only served 
to increase the scorn heaped upon him by his countrymen.

Although the term “whistleblower” is usually appended to Vanunu’s name, 
the description is weak and understated. He was more like the “siren” 
that alerted the world to Israel’s undeclared nuclear bombs and the 
introduction of weapons of mass destruction to the Middle East.

Shimon Peres – architect of Israel’s nuclear weapons program

In 1953, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion appointed a young 
Shimon Peres to become Director-General of the Ministry of Defense. 
Acting in this capacity, Peres helped draw up the 1956 Protocol of 
Sèvers (in the run-up to the British, French and Israeli attack on 
Suez). Those meetings led him to enlist France’s help in constructing 
the Negev Nuclear Research Center.

Peres’ critical involvement in developing Israel’s nuclear capability 
was detailed in “Shimon Peres – The Biography” by historian Michael 
Ben-Zohar. According to Reuters, “The book divulges new details of how 
Peres served as a behind-the-scenes architect of Israel's military 
might, securing weapons secretly and buying an atomic reactor from France.”

It was specifically because Peres had pioneered Israel’s nuclear weapons 
program that Vanunu asked his name be taken off the list of Nobel 
candidates. He wanted no association with the alleged “dove,” who as 
foreign minister was the recipient of the 1994 Peace Prize along with 
Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestinian National Authority 
President Yasser Arafat.

Shimon Peres – apologist for a massacre

It was during Israel’s “Grapes of Wrath” campaign in Lebanon that the 
April 1996 Qana massacre took place. At a United Nations compound near 
the village of Qana, 800 Lebanese civilians had sought refuge from the 
fighting. Showing utter disregard for both the U.N. and the civilians 
they sheltered, the compound was shelled by the Israelis, killing 106 
innocents and injuring more than 100.

Israel first said Hezbollah positions and not the U.N compound was their 
target (although they were aware of its exact coordinates). They later 
said the facility was inadvertently hit due to “incorrect targeting 
based on erroneous data” and the use of outdates maps (the ever-shifting 
explanations offered by the Israelis for a deliberate strike of a U.N. 
facility would later be repeated in the 2008-2009 Gaza War).

It was then Prime Minister Peres who finally justified the attack by 
blaming Hezbollah for it, using the tired, discredited, and oft-repeated 
“human shield” excuse (yet another tool used again by the Israel Defense 
Forces to rationalize the massacre of civilians in the Gaza War).

A subsequent U.N. investigation concluded it was unlikely that the 
shelling of the Qana compound was due to gross technical or procedural 
errors. An investigation conducted by Amnesty International found that 
the attack was “intentional and is condemned.” Human Rights Watch's 
report similarly stated, “We have declared this a massacre that was 
intentional using very highly accurate missiles and explosives.”

What the Nobel Committee and Vanunu should do

As the person who exposed Israel’s nuclear weapons program, Vanunu’s 
conscientious, principled position of requesting his name be removed 
from consideration for the same Peace Prize won by the man who fathered 
it, is admirable.

The Nobel Committee should not only continue to consider Vanunu however, 
but award its Peace Prize to him, if for no other reason than to redeem 
itself as a body recognizing deeds, not hopes.

An ignominious spotlight would then shine on Israel for preventing 
Vanunu from traveling to Norway to accept it, although he would still 
likely decline the Prize. If permitted to hold a press conference, it 
would give Vanunu the opportunity to tell the world of Peres’ shameful 
role in introducing nuclear weapons to the Middle East, to talk of the 
massacre at Qana that occurred under his leadership, to speak about the 
war crimes committed in Gaza and of Israel’s brutal occupation of East 
Jerusalem and the West Bank.

It is time once again for the Siren to sound.

Rannie Amiri is an independent Middle East commentator. He may be 
reached at: rbamiri AT yahoo DOT com.


-- 

Matthias Reichl, Pressesprecher/ press speaker,
Begegnungszentrum fuer aktive Gewaltlosigkeit
Center for Encounter and active Non-Violence
Wolfgangerstr. 26, A-4820 Bad Ischl, Austria,
fon: +43 6132 24590, Informationen/ informations,
Impressum in: http://www.begegnungszentrum.at
Spenden-Konto Nr. 0600-970305 (Blz. 20314) Sparkasse Bad Ischl,
Geschäftsstelle Pfandl
IBAN: AT922031400600970305 BIC: SKBIAT21XXX