[E-rundbrief] Info 498 - Business 'ignores' human rights
Matthias Reichl
info at begegnungszentrum.at
Fr Jan 19 11:30:01 CET 2007
E-Rundbrief - Info 498 -
Bad Ischl, 19.1.2007
Begegnungszentrum für aktive Gewaltlosigkeit
www.begegnungszentrum.at
===========================================================
Thursday, 18 January 2007
DEVELOPMENT: BUSINESS 'IGNORES' HUMAN RIGHTS
by Moyiga Nduru
JOHANNESBURG (IPS) - From Iraq to Nigeria,
multinational corporations are ignoring human
rights, entrenching a culture of abuse and
impunity that is difficult to eradicate, a
leading anti-apartheid activist warns. Kader
Asmal, a former South African minister of
education, says the abuses run from environmental
degradation around the world to the more than
90,000 security contractors, engaged in murky
multi-billion-dollar businesses, in war-torn Iraq.
"The contracts awarded lack accountability and
transparency under international laws. Many of
the companies, run by powerful countries, are
liable for war crimes," said Asmal, a lawyer and
a member of South Africa's parliament. No
official record exists of the number of security
firms in Iraq, some of which are believed to have been set up illegally.
But the Washington Post, quoting the military's
first census of the growing population of
civilians operating in the battlefield, said on
Dec. 6, 2006, that about 100,000 U.S. government
contractors operate in Iraq. They are involved in
a range of military-related activities, including
supplying army equipment, building military
barracks and providing private security to senior Iraqi officials.
Like Asmal, the more than 150 participants who
took part in a conference organised by the
Pretoria-based Foundation for Human Rights on
"business, accountability and human rights" in
Johannesburg, Jan.16-17, generally agreed that
the campaign to inculcate a culture of human
rights in business is moving slowly. There is
either a lack of interest, or reluctance, amongst
entrepreneurs, said conference participants. "The
word 'human rights' is a bogeyman for business,"
Yasmin Sooka, executive director of the
Foundation for Human Rights, told IPS. "Business doesn't like human rights."
"This campaign is, therefore, a process. In South
Africa we just emerged from apartheid 10 years
ago. It's going to take time for us to catch up
with the rest of the world," she said.
South Africa is learning the hard way. "We need a
code of conduct for South African companies
operating in the rest of Africa. I attended a
meeting with well educated Africans who
complained about the behaviour of South African
companies. We must look at this issue. We don't
want these companies to damage South Africa's
reputation," Asmal said. Emphasising the need for
a strict code of conduct, he said: "I am
concerned that South African companies do not
observe proper labour laws of the countries they operate in."
In the European Union and North America, business
is slowly embracing human rights. Christopher
Avery says 10 years ago he could not use the word
human rights in addressing the business
community. "That would cut off the discussion
immediately. I used euphemisms such as the rule
of law as a cover for human rights. Now the
business world accepts the words 'human rights',"
said Avery, who runs the U.S.-based website
business-humanrights.com with a membership of 3,500 companies.
In a study published in December 2006, the
Geneva-based Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights found that North
American and European companies are leaders in
their inclusion of human rights standards in
areas such as supply chain management.
The study, "Business Recognition of Human Rights:
Global Patterns, Regional and Sectoral
Variations", said two-thirds of the U.S.
companies in the sample and about 60 percent of
the Europeans address human rights concerns.
"Some 66 percent of the companies recognise both
freedom of association and the right to
collective bargaining. Nearly 75 percent of
European companies recognise both rights. In
contrast, 63 percent of North American companies
and around 50 percent of companies from each of
the remaining regions -- Asia, Pacific and Africa
-- recognise these rights," said the study,
authored by Michael Wright and Amy Lehr.
The study also looked at child labour, a serious
problem in Africa and Asia. It found that
"European and North American firms average around
65 percent recognition for abolition of forced
and child labour. European and North American
firms average around 65 percent recognition for
both prohibitions, Asia and Pacific companies
around 50 percent, while three of the five
African companies mention the prohibition against
slavery and forced labour, and a mere 25 percent
mention the abortion of child labour."
Sufian Bukurura, a professor of law at South
Africa's University of KwaZulu Natal, said the
United Nations started making serious links
between human rights, business and development
only in 1989. Even so, Bukurura said,
self-interests often influence government
decisions. He cited the British government's
dropping a fraud probe into a Saudi arms deal in
December 2006, as something based on London's
interests rather than on combating corruption.
The United Nations Global Compact, established in
2000, engages firms in implementing human rights,
labour standards, environmental and
anti-corruption practices. It has more than 3,000
members, with over half of the companies from developing countries..
"When I was in the Office of the United Nations
High Commission for Human Rights, I encouraged
the Commission to promote the norms of business
ethics. But most businesses were opposed and
terrified of the norm," Mary Robinson, former UN
High Commissioner for Human Rights, told the
Johannesburg gathering. "Some, however, borrowed
the norm, modified it and distributed it to other
companies. As a person with no business
background, I learned a lot from the networking
and discussions that followed," said Robinson,
founder in 2002 of Realising Rights: The Ethical Globalisation Initiative.
Also addressing the event, Frene Ginwala, vice
chancellor of the University of KwaZulu Natal,
criticised organisations like Transparency
International for focusing on bribe takers
instead of on bribe givers. "We are not going to
tackle the problem of corruption until we involve citizens," she said.
Hassan Lorgat, chairman of the South African
branch of Transparency International, said the
terrain of corruption is dominated by
multinationals with money. "My role is to push
for a development agenda within transparency international," he told IPS.
When former Anglican archbishop Desmond Tutu was
appointed chairman of the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission (TRC), Sampie
Terreblanche, professor of economics at South
Africa's Stellenbosch University, appealed, along
with a colleague, for a Business Truth Commission.
The aim was to investigate allegations of
apartheid era-crimes committed by multinational
companies such as the mining giant,
Anglo-American. "Some of these companies assisted
apartheid and exploited black people for a
century," he said in a conversation with IPS.
Unfortunately, local entrepreneurs were
conspicuously absent from the conference. An
organiser told IPS that they had invited business
people from the local community, but they didn't
turn up. One businessman, who requested his name
be withheld, told IPS it was unfortunate for the
conference to be criticising the business
community for not adhering to the principle of
human rights. Only constructive engagement, he
said, would address human rights issues in
business. (END) federico nier-fischer fnf_comunicaciones
- interkulturelle Kommunikation u. Vernetzung
Leit.Red. ips-columnists service Lehraufträge Universität Salzburg
Beheimgasse 20/7
A-1170 Wien
AUSTRIA
Tel/FAX: ++43 1 4071521
Mob: 0676 3105594
fnf_comunicaciones @ fastmail.fm
www.fnf-comunicaciones.at
===========================================================
Matthias Reichl, Pressesprecher/ press speaker,
Begegnungszentrum fuer aktive Gewaltlosigkeit
Center for Encounter and active Non-Violence
Wolfgangerstr. 26, A-4820 Bad Ischl, Austria,
fon: +43 6132 24590, Informationen/ informations,
Impressum in: http://www.begegnungszentrum.at
Spenden-Konto Nr. 0600-970305 (Blz. 20314)
Sparkasse Bad Ischl, Geschäftsstelle Pfandl
IBAN: AT922031400600970305 BIC: SKBIAT21XXX
Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste E-rundbrief